|
Definition
Information sources
Current Conditions
Stakeholders
History
Trends
Expected future
Potential wildcards
Issues, dilemmas, choices
Key uncertainties
Alternative futures
Leading indicators
Current Conditions
Top 20 largest world urbanised areas, 1991
Rank |
Name |
Population |
Sq. miles |
Pop/sq. mile |
1 |
Tokyo-Yokohama |
27,245,000 |
1,089 |
25,018 |
2 |
Mexico City |
20,889,000 |
522 |
40,036 |
3 |
Sao Paulo |
18,701,000 |
451 |
41,466 |
4 |
Seoul |
16,792,000 |
342 |
49,099 |
5 |
New York |
14,625,000 |
1,274 |
11,480 |
6 |
Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto |
13,872,000 |
495 |
28,024 |
7 |
Bombay |
12,101,000 |
95 |
127,379 |
8 |
Calcutta |
11,898,000 |
209 |
56,928 |
9 |
Rio de Janeiro |
11,688,000 |
260 |
44,954 |
10 |
Buenos Aires |
11,657,000 |
535 |
21,789 |
11 |
Moscow |
10,446,000 |
379 |
27,562 |
12 |
Manila |
10,156,000 |
188 |
54,021 |
13 |
Los Angeles |
10,130,000 |
1,110 |
9,126 |
14 |
Cairo |
10,099,000 |
104 |
97,106 |
15 |
Jakarta |
9,882,000 |
76 |
130,026 |
16 |
Teheran |
9,779,000 |
112 |
87,313 |
17 |
London |
9,115,000 |
874 |
10,429 |
18 |
Delhi |
8,778,000 |
138 |
63,609 |
19 |
Paris |
8,720,000 |
432 |
20,185 |
20 |
Karachi |
8,014,000 |
190 |
42,179 |
Source: www.demographia.com/db-wldurb91.htm
Top 20 largest American metropolitan areas, 1998
Rank |
Metro area |
population |
% change since 1990 |
1 |
New York-N New Jersey-Long Island |
20,102,875 |
3.2% |
2 |
Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County |
16,036,587 |
10.4% |
3 |
Chicago-Gary-Kenosha |
8,885,919 |
7.8% |
4 |
Washington-Baltimore |
7,359,044 |
9.4% |
5 |
San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose |
6,873,645 |
9.5% |
6 |
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City |
5,999,034 |
1.8% |
7 |
Boston-Worcester-Lawrence-Lowell-Brockton |
5,901,589 |
3.8% |
8 |
Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint |
5,469,312 |
5.4% |
9 |
Dallas-Fort Worth |
4,909,523 |
21.6% |
10 |
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria |
4,493,741 |
20.4% |
11 |
Atlanta |
3,857,097 |
30.3% |
12 |
Miami-Fort Lauderdale |
3,711,102 |
16.2% |
13 |
Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton |
3,465,760 |
16.7% |
14 |
Phoenix-Mesa |
3,013,696 |
34.6% |
15 |
Cleveland-Akron |
2,910,616 |
1.8% |
16 |
Minneapolis-St. Paul |
2,872,109 |
13.1% |
17 |
San Diego |
2,820,844 |
12.92% |
18 |
St. Louis |
2,591,456 |
3.2% |
19 |
Denver-Boulder-Greeley |
2,417,908 |
22.1% |
20 |
Pittsburgh |
2,331,336 |
-2.6% |
Source: www.demographia.com/db-met99r.htm
Number of vehicles per 1,000 population
Area |
Vehicles/
1000 people |
USA |
767 |
Japan |
535 |
UK |
481 |
Eastern Europe |
128 |
Latin America |
90 |
Africa |
22 |
World Average |
115 |
Source: S. Potter, M.J. Skinner, Futures 32 (2000), p277.
Public transport rides per capita per year in industrial metropolitan areas
(1995 estimates)
Largest urban areas |
Per capita rides |
Moscow |
568 |
Tokyo |
513 |
Bombay |
346 |
Osaka |
338 |
Paris |
300 |
Mexico City |
262 |
Seoul |
204 |
Cairo |
202 |
Sao Paulo |
187 |
Rio de Janeiro |
184 |
Buenos Aires |
184 |
London |
177 |
Manila |
159 |
Calcutta |
159 |
New York |
105 |
Los Angeles |
28 |
Other urban areas |
|
Sydney |
155 |
Montreal |
118 |
Toronto |
106 |
Melbourne |
93 |
San Francisco |
55 |
Chicago |
55 |
Washington-Baltimore |
53 |
Philadelphia |
47 |
Source: www.publicpurpose.com/ut-wldua.htm
[Estimated from Jane's Urban Transport, US Federal Transit Administration
and individual operator reports.]
[ next page ]
|