2013-03-01 (Friday)
Links
-
How We Built “Music Looks Awesome” & How You Can Join In - This Is My Jam
Brilliant stuff - automatically making big, interesting, background images from a smaller album/video image.
-
Digital Pianos - Which Brand Should I Buy
Every few years I have a browse, and there’s so little comprehensive information around online. This site is a bit of a sprawling mess but has tons of stuff on it. It sounds nicely honest for a shop. [UPDATE: The owner also owns the Classenti brand, the brand of pianos he favours here… not so honest after all.]
Tweets
@jonty It looks like the table tennis table is in these “Media Style Offices” if you need any pro tips: goo.gl/maps/HA7jw
@denisewilton I bet they’re not usually “an invader, an ode, a brand in waiting, a pitch to the market…aggressive and experimental” though.
@lemonjelly We are too primitive to be allowed to see your “moving pictures”.
@lemonjelly “THE VIDEO YOU ARE TRYING TO WATCH CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM YOUR CURRENT COUNTRY OR LOCATION.”
@lemonjelly “The uploader has not made this video available in your country.” Bah.
Coming down after a weird post-lunch burrito and caffeine rush. Phew. I imagine San Francisco’s tech community feel like that all the time.
@rooreynolds @edwardhorsford @dracos Brilliant, well done. We need a public repo for the whole Internet, then @dracos will fix everything!
@stml @tomtaylor I was expecting to see a slow-motion close-up of the breeze block shattering the head of a humanoid dummy.
@rooreynolds Smashing. Easily missed that one; I always have to stop and think through both options.
@paulpod All requests to view a website must first be approved by your House Committee, the Barbican Association, and the Lord Mayor.
@nickludlam @thegareth Yes. At least I’ll have a good reason to switch to our estate’s new broadband system when it arrives this year.
@nickludlam @thegareth Oh, poo. My barely-thought-through politics-by-consumerism stance is now compromised.
@rooreynolds I’m sure there are much more important things, but “Less views”? “Fewer views”, surely?